Adam Stetzer, Ph.D.
← Publications
1997Journal of Quality Management

Organizational Climate and Ineffectiveness: Evidence from 25 Outdoor Work Crew Divisions

Stetzer, A., Morgeson, F. P., & Anderson, E. — Journal of Quality Management, Vol. 2, pp. 251–265

Overview

This study investigates the relationship between organizational climate and work crew ineffectiveness using a sample of 25 outdoor work crew divisions. Outdoor work crews — such as those involved in utility maintenance, landscaping, or construction — present a useful research context because their outputs are relatively observable and their performance depends heavily on group coordination, communication, and shared norms about work quality and safety.

The Role of Climate

Organizational climate refers to the shared perceptions employees hold about the practices, policies, and procedures that characterize their work environment. These perceptions signal to employees what behaviors are expected, rewarded, and supported. Stetzer, Morgeson, and Anderson examined multiple climate dimensions — including those related to communication quality, coordination among crew members, safety orientation, and management support — and assessed how variation in these dimensions across the 25 divisions corresponded to differences in ineffectiveness outcomes.

Findings

Divisions with more positive organizational climates — particularly those characterized by open communication, clear role expectations, and strong management support — showed lower levels of ineffectiveness. The results suggest that climate dimensions operate as levers that organizations can use to reduce operational problems and improve crew-level performance. Notably, safety-related climate factors were intertwined with general performance outcomes, reinforcing the idea that safety and productivity are complementary rather than competing goals.

Significance

This paper contributes to the quality management literature by grounding organizational effectiveness in climate perceptions rather than solely in process or technical factors. It also demonstrates the value of studying front-line work crews — a population sometimes underrepresented in organizational research — and provides practical guidance for managers seeking to diagnose and address sources of ineffectiveness in field-based operations.